Routing Protocols: Distance Vector vs. Link-State
Routing protocols are essential for determining the best path for data packets in a network. Two primary types of routing protocols are Distance Vector and Link-State. These protocols differ in how they calculate routes, share information, and react to changes in the network.
1. Distance Vector Routing Protocols
Overview:
- Concept: The router determines the best path by counting hops (distance) to the destination.
- Routing Table Exchange: Routers periodically exchange their entire routing tables with their directly connected neighbors.
- Algorithm: Bellman-Ford algorithm.
- Metric: Hop count (number of routers to reach the destination).
- Network View: Routers have a limited view — they only know the distance and direction to a destination, not the full network topology.
How It Works:
- Each router starts with knowledge of its directly connected networks.
- Periodically, routers share their routing tables with neighbors.
- If a neighbor advertises a shorter path to a destination, the router updates its table.
- The process continues until all routers converge (agree on the best paths).
Key Characteristics:
- Simple to implement.
- Slow convergence – takes time to detect network changes.
- Looping problem – routers can enter routing loops.
- Count to Infinity – Routing loops continue until hop count exceeds a limit (e.g., RIP limits at 15 hops).
- Periodic Updates – Entire routing table is broadcast at regular intervals.
Examples of Distance Vector Protocols:
- RIP (Routing Information Protocol)
- Hop count as the metric.
- Maximum of 15 hops (16 is considered unreachable).
- Suitable for small networks.
- IGRP (Interior Gateway Routing Protocol)
- Cisco proprietary.
- Uses multiple metrics (bandwidth, delay, load).
- More scalable than RIP.
2. Link-State Routing Protocols
Overview:
- Concept: Routers build a complete map of the network by learning about the state of each link (connection).
- Routing Table Exchange: Routers exchange small updates (link-state advertisements) only when there is a network change.
- Algorithm: Dijkstra’s Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm.
- Metric: Cost, usually based on bandwidth.
- Network View: Routers have a complete view of the network topology.
How It Works:
- Each router discovers its neighbors by sending "hello" packets.
- Routers send link-state advertisements (LSAs) to inform others about the state of their links.
- LSAs are flooded throughout the network, allowing every router to build an identical network map.
- Each router independently calculates the shortest path to each destination.
Key Characteristics:
- Faster convergence – quickly adapts to network changes.
- No looping issues – full network map prevents routing loops.
- Resource-intensive – requires more CPU and memory to maintain the topology.
- Efficient updates – only sends updates when changes occur, reducing bandwidth usage.
Examples of Link-State Protocols:
- OSPF (Open Shortest Path First)
- Open standard.
- Supports hierarchical design (areas).
- Scalable for large networks.
- IS-IS (Intermediate System to Intermediate System)
- Common in ISPs and large networks.
- Supports multi-area design like OSPF.
Comparison: Distance Vector vs. Link-State
Feature | Distance Vector | Link-State |
---|---|---|
Algorithm | Bellman-Ford | Dijkstra’s SPF |
Convergence Speed | Slow | Fast |
Scalability | Small to medium networks | Large networks |
Network View | Limited (next hop info) | Complete network topology |
Routing Loops | Possible (count to infinity) | Not possible |
Resource Usage | Low (simple computation) | High (memory, CPU intensive) |
Update Type | Periodic (entire table) | Event-driven (LSA updates) |
Examples | RIP, IGRP | OSPF, IS-IS |
Key Takeaways:
- Distance Vector protocols are simple and suitable for smaller networks but are prone to slower convergence and routing loops.
- Link-State protocols are more efficient, scalable, and loop-free but require higher resources and are better suited for large networks.
Comments
Post a Comment